Alan Seeger is a poet who lived from 1888-1916 who died in World War I. After a little research I have decided the more literal meaning of this poem is a literal account of the war. The terms like disputed barricade, battered hill and flaming town demonstrate this clearly when just interpreting the presented elements just as they are. The rendezvous between Alan and Death is explaining the battlefield and how at each confrontation soldiers could be killed or survive another day. I first heard this poem being read for a Gears of War 2 trailer and it stuck in my head ever since. When I first heard this I was unaware the author was a soldier from the First World War and I interpreted the poem in a completely different way.
To be honest I kind of understood the poem as almost a last explanation from someone before they die of age or perhaps commit suicide. After coding the artifact for myself I identified a suggested element for some of the presented elements. First, the lines saying “I have a rendezvous with death” equal a voluntary acceptance of death or giving in to death. Secondly, the lines describing when spring is returning could represent renewal or new beginnings such as in the afterlife. The lines like disputed barricade and flaming town I interpreted as inner turmoil creating conflict within the writer. These various ideas could be placed into categories like, “giving up”, “natural renewal” and “unsettling environments”.
Using a previously discussed method I would have most likely thought narrative or metaphor criticism would be best for this poem. In my own analysis I may create an explanatory schema using headings or concepts I might call, dynamics, subject context and diction. Dynamics refers to the structure of the poem and how it is set up to be read a specific way. This particular poem reads slow and calm and creates a feeling of acceptance. Subject context refers to all the different perspectives the poem could be interpreted through. This is how I applied my own experiences to create the ideation of a suicidal or elderly person instead of a soldier. This second concept works hand in hand with the diction, the choices of speech and words used by the rhetor. In this poem he chose vague words that produced enough of a definition to imagine something but not detailed enough to exactly know what the rhetor meant. For example, the term “rendezvous” is an interesting word choice. Is it an organized meeting at a time and place? Is it just going to happen at random?